LEGISLATOR
CONTENTS
2. Participation in the work of the Legislature 1-2
3. Scrutiny of Government's performance 2-3
4. Maintenance of Parliamentary decorum 3
5. Eloquence in Legislature 3-4
7. Conflicting demands 6-7
8. Conclusion . 7-8
INTRODUCTION
A legislator, in fact, is several persons in one-a representative of
his constituency, a member of the Legislature, sometimes a Minister, a
party man and often a member or spokesman of a particular interest or a
community. His obligations are many and not always easy to reconcile. He
owes loyalty to the people of the constituency that return him to the Legislature,
the party to which he belongs, and above all, to the nation as a whole.
Participation in the work of the Legislature:
The most important problem before a new legislator is that of making
a headway in the House. Though the House may be polite to a new entrant
to its ranks, it is never too friendly. In order to play his role effectively,
a legislator must make full use of all the available opportunities and
participate actively in the business before the House. To this end, a number
of procedures have been developed, some traditional and some new. A Member
can ask questions, raise half-an-hour discussions, short duration discussions,
give notices for adjournment motions,1 calling attention, no-day-yet-named
motions, and Private Members' resolutions, etc. He can also raise a matter
under Rule 377 in Lok Sabha and through special mention in Rajya Sabha.
A legislator can also make meaningful contribution by participating in
the debate on the Motion of Thanks on the President's Address and on the
Budget.
A legislator cannot effectively raise a matter in the House and
__________________________________________________________________________________1
In the Lok Sabha only.
follow it up unless he has done a good deal of home work and is equipped
with information on the subject. The study of economic, political and social
journals along with different informative documents, published through
government or non-government agencies and, newspapers of different categories
will prove useful in this regard. According to his interest he may also
develop specialisation in certain fields. Describing the qualities which
make a legislator successful Shrimati Indira Gandhi once said:
Scrutiny of Government's performance:
The dominance of the Executive in the legislative and financial fields
is a common feature of modern parliamentary systems. The
__________________________________________________________________________________2(1)
The Muslim Wakfs Bill, 1952, (2) The Indian Registration (Amendment) Bill,
1955, (3) The Parliamentary Proceedings (Protection of Publication) Bill,
1956, (4) The Code (if Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Bill, 1956, (5) The
Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains (Declaration
of National Importance) Amendment Bill, 1954, (6) The Hindu Marriage (Amendment)
Bill, 1956, (7) the Women and Childrens' Institutions (Licensing) Bill,
1956, (8) The Orphanages and other Charitable Homes (Supervision and Control)
Bill, 1959, (9) The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Bill, 1959,
(10) The Indian Marine Insurance Bill, 1959, (11) The Salaries and Allowances
of Members of Parliament (Amendment) Bill, 1964, (12) The Hindu Marriage
(Amendment) Bill, 1964, (13) The Indian Penal Code (Amendment) Bill, 1963,
(14) The Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction)
Bill, 1969 were all initiated by Private Members.
Legislature has to see whether the enormous power and resources held
by the Executive are properly and judiciously used. A vigilant member of
legislature can elicit information and focus attention on specific aspects
of governmental policies or activities and other important matters of public
concern by making use of various procedural devices available to him under
the Rules of Procedure. A Member can also keep a close and continuous check
on governmental activities through his participation in the deliberations
of the Parliamentary Committees.
Maintenance of Parliamentary decorum:
On the floor of the House, legislators are duty-bound to follow various
rules and guidelines which are necessary for orderly and smooth transaction
of business and for upholding the dignity and decorum of the House. These
rules and guidelines lie scattered in different sources such as the Constitution,
the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business, the Handbook for Members,
etc. There also exist numerous customs and conventions and other parliamentary
etiquette based on past precedents, rulings of the' Chair and even unrecorded
traditions, which have to be observed by the legislators. If a Member feels
aggrieved in the House and wants to convey his feelings, he can convincingly
do so within the framework of rules. There is no need for him to resort
to walkouts or use unparliamentary language. Further, a Member must be
time conscious and use every minute of the time of the House most economically
and purposefully. The maintenance of parliamentary decorum and submission
to the discipline of the House should be taken as a duty.
Eloquence in Legislature:
Oratorical skill is an added qualification for an effective legislator.
This talent helps him to give a good account of himself to the electorate
and successfully play the role expected of him by his constituents and
party. An eloquent legislator can give a different dimension to any issue
and can turn the course of any debate. He can present a very common idea
in the most effective way and can successfully persuade the House to view
the issue from his angle. This is amply proved by several instances in
the history of parliamentary institutions in our country and elsewhere.
One may wonder, whether it is possible for a legislator, however eloquent
he may be, to carry the House with him in modern parliamentary democracies
where members are expected to vote according to party policy and party
whip, irrespective of their own personal convictions. But parliamentary
history is replete with instances of stalwarts with erudition and eloquence
commanding influence in the House which was disproportionately high for
the size of their following. Such gifted legislators can even bring the
government round to their point of view.
A legislator enjoys immunity from legal consequences for anything he
may speak in the House. This privilege enables him to call a spade a spade
without fear or hesitation. There are, however, certain restrictions also.
He has to speak within the purview of his party’s policies. Further, even
if he carches the eye of the Chair, there will always be time-limit within
which he has to put forth his case. Another characteristic of legislative
eloquence is the strict insistence on relevance. To be effective, the legislator
should remain present in the House and follow what others speak so that
when his turn comes he avoids repetition of points already made, and where
he disagrees with views expressed by a Minister or a colleague earlier,
he explains his stand with reasons therefor. Within these constraints,
a successful legislator has to combine the emotional appeal of a leader
with the argumentative skill of a lawyer and the capacity for exposition
of the lecturer.
Legislators-- a link between the Citizens and the Government:
A legislator is the accredited representative of his constituency. He,
on the one hand, is responsible for the well-being of his constituency
and on the other hand, he is one of the law-makers also. This representative
status of the legislators gives them a special position which makes them
admirably suited to play the role of an intermediary between the people
and the Government. A legislator has to interpret the aspirations of the
people to the Government and also to convey the view-point of the Government
to the people.
Nursing the constituency to which a legislator belongs, is an essential
duty of a legislator. He must combine in himself the attributes of a social
worker, orator and politician. He must be imbued with a spirit of service
and above all, sense of sacrifice and self-denial. The constituency, being
the centre of his activities, should be his first concern and his success
or failure as a legislator will depend largely on the attitude that the
people of his constituency have towards him. He must be thoroughly conversant
with the problems of his constituency, the hopes and aspirations of its
people and should have a clear grasp of the means by which he can meet
the genuine demands of his contituents. In fact, a legislator is regarded
by the public as a welfare officer or a `case worker’. The common men look
up to him for help and very often he has to intercede on their behalf with
the public functionaries for finding solutions to their problems and redressal
of their grievances. But very often, he is required to attend to individual
complaints, the nature of which may vary from securing employment for an
unemployed educated youth to the transfer of an erring local official.
While he has to tackle the problems abilities to the best of his understanding
and a line has to be drawn where self-interest ends and national interest
or community interest begins. Nothing can be more gratifying or fulfilling
to a legislator than the satisfaction that he has been able to contribute
constructively to the welfare of the people.
By virtue of their special position as leaders of the community, legislators
are placed in a unique position to mould public opinion and influence the
Government. They can provide the valueable inputs/feed back as from the
field and indicate the winds of change to the Government to take note of,
in formulating its policies and programmes. In a country like ours, legislators
can also make a real contribution to the process of development and social
transformation, by mobilising the support of the people and enlighting
them. Developmental activities offer legislators plenty of opportunities
to work for the all-round progress of their constituencies and in the process,
help the nation as a whole to advance.
It is a part of the duty of a legislator to educate his electorate and
in order to be able to do that he has to educate himself first. Once he
is elected, even though by a thin majority, from a constituency, the legislator
must consider himself as the representative of the whole electorate. He
must not make any distinction between the people
who supported him and the people who did not, because he is elected
to serve the entire electorate. He should regularly interact with his constituents
on various issues that may crop up from time to time. Even though, for
instance, a particular piece of legislation has resulted in hardship to
a certain section of the people, the legislator must explain why and how
that legislation was necessary in the overall interest of the country or
the State. It should be his first and foremost concern to enlighten the
people about their civic duties and responsibilities, the need for discipline
and restraint in public life. He is required to make concerted and conscious
efforts to eradicate social evils.
Conflicting demands:
One of the most important problems confronting a legislator results
from a clash between his loyalties to the nation and the party. This kind
of situation does not anise everyday but when it does, it puts a severe
strain on the nerves of a legislator. While on the one hand, the party
discipline requires that he should support a measure to which his party
is committed, his own conscience may goad him to oppose it. Sometimes he
may be having an uneasy feeling that his constituency is hostile to a measure
and he would be failing in his duty if he supported it. Edmund Burke gave
his classic answer to this major dilemma in a representative democracy
in these words:
directions issued by the party to which he belongs otherwise he may
face disqualification from membership on grounds of defection. However,
disqualification on grounds of defection shall not apply in case of split
in his party (i.e. when the faction arising as a result of the split is
not less than one-third of the members of such legislature party) or merger
of his party with another party (when not less than two thirds of the members
of the party have agreed to such merger). In resolving other conflicting
demands he has to take decisions to the best of his understanding. A line
has to be drawn where self-interest ends and where national interest begins.
The legislator has to work for the national interest and not to the self-interest
of some people. The interest of the country should be uppermost in the
mind of the legislator and he need not he led by the masses when he feels
that a particular step would not be in the interest of the country.
Conclusion:
The legislature as a representative institution, performs a crucial
role as the central arena where all the competing forces in the polity
are brought face to face for organised interaction. If the corporate conscience
of the community is to find voice and assert itself democratically, it
can be done only in a Legislature---a forum--by the people's representatives.
Who else can rightfully espouse and uphold the cause of the poor, down-trodden
and the defenceless? It is often forgotten that the very object of the
privileges and immunities, which legislators enjoy, is to enable them to
perform these tasks freely and fearlessly. The people's representatives,
holding a standing brief on behalf of the common man work as the guarantor
of the overall good of the community, and as a guardian of public interest.
Thus the role which the legislator performs in our democratic polity, is
very vital and very important.
A legislator has to maintain his Wit in the primacy (if moral values
and ethical conduct in public life, promote civility, graciousness and
a sense of fair-play in inter-personal dealings. He has to set an example
and be the torch-bearer of society. To sum up, in the words of Sir Winston
Churchill:
SOURCES CONSULTED
2. Bal Ram Jakhar : People, Parliament and Administration
(1982).
3. A. Shankar : Efficacy of Eloquence in Parliamentary
Information, Vol. 17, No, 4, October, 1971).
4. Bal Ram Jakhar : Parliamentary Decorum (Journal of
Parliamentary Information, Vol. 31, No. 4,
March, 1985)
The need to make the institution of Parliament more effective in overseeing
the Executive can hardly be over emphasised. Parliament is a body composed
of the elected representatives of the people. Its strength and effectiveness
as a representative body, therefore depends to a great extent, on the dedication,
zeal and knowledge of its Members.